Lower Energy Bills Are Just The Beginning of Energy Efficient Lighting Paybacks!

What business isn’t looking for cost–effective ways to increase productivity and safety? And yet few executives realize that upgraded lighting provides a broad  range  of benefits in addition to substantially reducing energy expenses. The documented benefits include:

• Optimum employee performance.

Proper  lighting levels contribute to employees working better and longer. Older, more experienced employees might develop impaired vision as their eyes lose the ability to adjust to insufficient lighting. Improvements to help them and all employees maintain their effectiveness will have a real payback in value added to the organization.

• Improved safety.

Good lighting enables employees to adjust to changing conditions more quickly. The sooner a worker sees a hazard, the longer he or she has to adjust and avoid it. Well–lit workplaces are safer workplaces.

• Improved morale.

Well–designed lighting makes the workplace brighter and more attractive.

• Increased productivity.

Proper lighting levels allows employees to maintain focuses, see tasks more clearly and catch mistakes earlier. As a result, they perform less
non–productive work. Quality improves, and the cost of quality declines.

• Less fatigue.

Straining to see causes more energy use, stress and fatigue. Eliminating this controllable form of stress can heighten employees’ energy levels by reducing the amount of nervous energy expended trying to see in poor lighting conditions.

• Cleaner facilities.

Under dark, shadowy conditions, it is easy to overlook problems, such as waste  build–up  in corners behind furniture and equipment, and in
stairwells.

For  additional information on the benefits and paybacks of a lighting upgrade, please contact an Aelux Lighting Solutions Manager.

Source:
FacilitiesNet.com

According to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association, the average compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) contains 4 milligrams (mg) of mercury. 5 mg is just enough to cover the tip of a ballpoint pen. Some products have reached as low as 1.5 mg. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) advises that in the event of bulb breakage, most of the mercury will remain bound to the lamp with the amount escaping estimated from 1.2 to 6.8 percent. This means if a CFL containing 4 mg of mercury is not recycled and breaks, 0.05–0.27 mg may be emitted.

As scary as that may sound, Craig DiLouie of Electrical Contractor Magazine reports that incandescent bulbs are actually substantially worse than CFLs when it comes to mercury emissions. DiLouie explains that coal-fired power plants produce about one-half of all electricity in the United States and are the largest source of human-caused mercury emissions in the country—more than 50 tons in 2006. A portion of these emissions are airborne, oxidized and water-soluble; some mercury ends up deposited in the United States, while the rest enters the global cycle (more than half the mercury deposited in the United States, for example, originates at Asian factories). Mercury released into the air is the main way it gets into water; eating contaminated fish is subsequently the main way humans become exposed.

And, incandescent lamps consume three to four times more energy than a CFL. Therefore incandescent bulbs cause more atmospheric mercury emissions at power plants that burn coal. DiLouie reports that a 75W incandescent operating over a period of 10,000 hours—the rated life of a competitive 18W CFL—will, therefore, generate an average 9.2 mg of atmospheric mercury emissions nationally, while the 18W CFL will generate 2.2 mg (plus possibly up to another 0.27 mg if the lamp is broken).

Accordingly, CFLs produce less mercury nationally. They also slash carbon emissions and provide substantial energy cost savings. DiLouie also reported that Yale University has demonstrated the same finding for states that don’t burn coal for power and mercury emitted during lamp production.

Additionally, manufacturers continuing to reduce the amount of mercury in their products, attention to lamp recycling is increasing and the EPA’s Clean Air Mercury Rule goes into final implementation in 2018 will contribute to substantial reductions in mercury emissions from coal-fired plant.

The Aelux team continuously monitors findings related to environmental safety and cost efficiency. Many are posted on the Aelux Energy Savings blog. Also feel free to contact us with any questions on these topics or any others.

Source: Electrical Contractor Magazine

Start With A Professional Audit

It’s impossible to engineer a lighting retrofit solution without a comprehensive audit!

The adage ‘Garbage In, Garbage Out’ is applicable to every lighting retrofit. A good audit is much more than just counting fixtures, and should allow your lighting partner to simulate your facility based on an exhaustive collection of data. Any retrofit recommendation not based on a multi-faceted, detailed audit is highly suspect.

An inadequate audit not only fails to provide the greatest opportunity for energy savings—it can create added costs down the road in change orders and system modifications, increased maintenance and poor productivity.

A qualified and experienced auditor will:

• recognize opportunities for controls and daylighting
• understand light level requirements by task (as defined by IESNA)
• and most importantly, should understand your objectives so that engineers can provide the right recommendations for you to choose from.

Contact any Aelux consultant or visit the Essential Retrofit Guidelines for more information.